These
kids today I swear...they throw around terms like "old school" when
referring to things that are from 2007. Well screw that..."The
Histories" by Herodotus was written sometime around 450-420 BC. Now
THAT'S frickin' old school. In fact, Herodotus is often referred to as
"The Father of History" since his is the first work of western history
that we have, and one that he extensively researched and systematically
arranged. Now, by research I mean he traveled all around the ancient
world, talked to everyone he could corner in a bar, and wrote down their
stories. Which leads me to wonder...what did he write stuff down on?
Paper? Papyrus? Did he use a pen? Did he carry all his notes around
with him in a backpack? Because he was so old school that he didn't
have a MacBook, or even a Commodore 64 running WordPerfect, on which to
take notes. In fact, this was before people made notebooks, or index
cards. So the practical aspects of writing a history like this in 450
BC are troubling to ponder. Unless he just had one helluva freaking
amazing memory. But who knows...so let's just drink our whiskey and get
on with it.
Here are presented the results of the enquiry carried out by Herodotus of Halicarnassus. The purpose is to prevent the traces of human events from being erased by time, and to preserve the fame of the important and remarkable achievements produced by both Greeks and non-Greeks...
How
poignant is that: "To prevent the traces of human events from being
erased by time"? That's depressing when you think about it, especially
when it comes to our own lives. All the traces of our pain and
heartache and joys and thrills and loves erased by time. Crap, maybe I
need to drink some more whiskey to help that process along. Hold
on...ahhh, better. Anyway, Herodotus did a good job at meeting his
objective because he is the sole source for much of the history and
incidents he recounts. He did indeed prevent the memory of these things
from being erased by time. Good going, dude!
As
one starts reading "The Histories" it quickly becomes clear that
Herodotus's work is not what would today be called a history book. For
one thing, Herodotus is much more anecdotal. While the book does
recount the origins and history of the conflict between the Greeks and
Persians, it's not a dry recounting of a chronology. Instead the book
is laden with stories about individuals and events, many of which are
fun and interesting to read, and some of which are probably not true
(like the story of large ants that dig for gold). But they're fun to
read anyway, so what the hell. The second big trait of Herodotus's work
is that he often goes off on long tangents that really digress from the
narrative of the historic events. The most notable of these is in
Chapter 2, where he goes on and on about the customs, culture, and
religion of the people of Egypt, whom the Persian Empire invaded before
they turned their eyes to Greece. These digressions are fun, and
contain valuable anthropological and ethnographic information, but in
our modern era of book editors and ADD drugs they are quite unexpected.
Herodotus
chronicles the rise of the Persian Empire under its first great leader,
Cyrus the Great. One of Cyrus's early conquests was of the ancient
kingdom of Lydia, whose leader was Croesus. Croesus ruled from 560-546
BC, and was a very happy and wealthy man (hence the phrase, still in
use, "as rich as Croesus"). I mean, this dude was so loaded with dough
that Herodotus tells us he let his guests leave the palace with as much
gold as they could carry, and Croesus didn't sweat that one bit.
Croesus conquers some Greek cities in Ionia, and then thinks that maybe
he should invade Persia. So like any good king back 2500 years ago, he
first consults an oracle (no, not the software company) and asks whether
he should invade Persia. The oracle tells him that if he invades
Persia he will destroy a great empire. So Croesus gets all amped up,
does a double fist pump, and proceeds to invade Persia. Of course it
turns out that the great empire he destroys is his own, as he loses his
kingdom to Cyrus and becomes his prisoner. (Lesson: always think
through carefully what an oracle tells you). This story seems to be a
parable of one of the great truisms of life, that good fortune is not
immutable, and that happiness and good fortune and wealth can all
disappear in an instant, depending on both chance and bad choices. This
theme of course is also mirrored in the defeat of the rich Persian
empire at the hands of the poor Greeks.
Cyrus
goes on to conquer other lands, including Babylon. Then, when he is
killed in battle, his son Cambyses takes over as head of the Persian
Empire. Cambyses invades Egypt, and it is here that Herodotus goes into
the great diversion I've already mentioned, going on for pages and
pages about the people and culture of Egypt. It's interesting, and no
doubt of great importance to ethnographers and anthropologists and
Egyptologists, but some of the reading here was a bit dry for my
tastes. Nonetheless, the story picks up again when Cambyses conquers
Egypt, and then according to Herodotus goes insane. He tries to invade
Ethiopia with disastrous consequences, kills a sacred Egyptian bull,
kills his brother, and then marries and subsequently kills his sister.
Good times. Eventually some folks have had enough, and conspirators
kill Cambyses, and one of the conspirators, Darius, takes over as head
of the Empire.
Under
Darius, the Greeks living in Ionia revolt against Persian rule (500-494
BC). Darius clamps down hard on the situation, but then is so pissed
off at the Greek peoples that he decides to attack Athens and burn the
place to the ground as retribution. This lead to a showdown between the
Greek and Persian armies at the Battle of Marathon (490 BC)...about
20,000 Persians vs. 10,000 Athenians and their allies. The Greeks
charged and routed the Persians, resulting in 6400 Persian dead and only
192 Greeks dead. Go Athens...WOOOO!!! The Persians scampered away,
and Athens had saved all of Greece from Persian enslavement, paving the
way for classical Greek civilization to flourish and give us Plato,
Socrates, and all the other greats who formed the basis of western
civilization.
So
now everyone lived happily ever after in peace and harmony, right? Uh,
well, no. Turns out Darius was now even more pissed at the Greeks.
"#*$^$% Greek motherf#*$^#!! I'll #&$% kill those
@&*^$" he allegedly said, or something to that effect. So he
decides to put together a HUGE army and totally subjugate all of
Greece. Then he dies suddenly. Ah well, so all is forgotten then and
everyone lives happily ever after in peace and harmony, right? Um,
no...no such luck. His son, Xerxes, is even more of a hothead than his
old man, and decides to put his father's plan into action. So he takes
his HUGE army, which Herodotus claims has 2,641,210 men in it (which
seems like stretch to me, but whatever) and invades Greece. But two
things happen before the invasion which illuminate Xerxes's personality
for us. First, an old rich guy who's always been a loyal and trusted
supporter of Xerxes comes to him and says "Xerxes, dude, my five sons
are all in your army. Do you mind if the oldest one stays home with me
to look after the farm because I'm old and can't do it any more? The
other four sons will gladly fight and die for you". Xerxes tells him to
bring the eldest son to him, and when the father does Xerxes has the
son killed and his body chopped in half, and makes his entire army march
between the two halves of the son's body as they march out of Persia.
Lesson learned: don't fuck with Xerxes before he's had his morning
coffee...or afterwards either. Then, Xerxes has his engineers build a
bridge across the Hellespont, a narrow strait (located in modern day
Turkey) that separates Asia from Europe. So they build the bridge but
then a storm comes along and destroys the bridge before the army can
cross. This does not sit well with Xerxes, so after chopping the
engineers' heads off, he instructs his men to whip the waters of the
Hellespont and then throw chains in the water to symbolically tell the
Hellespont that it is his slave. Now in those days, when there were
Gods watching over everything, that was just not cool. But that's
Xerxes for you. No one messes with him, consequences be damned.
Anyway,
Xerxes has his fits and then his HUGE army invades Greece. It's only
the largest freaking army ever raised! Greece is doomed, right?!? And
to make matters worse, many Greek city states said "Fuck it" and decided
not to resist the Persians or help in the fight. This pretty much left
mostly Athens and Sparta to fight the Persians on their own.
Fortunately Sparta helped put together an alliance called the Hellenic
League, with Athens, Sparta, and some other city states all agreeing to
stop fighting one another and to pool their resources to fight the
Persians. They first met the Persian army head on at Thermopylae, a
narrow pass in the mountains where the Persian army had to pass through
to get to the rest of Greece. About 6,000 Greek defenders were there to
fight the several million Persians. The Greeks had the high ground in
defending the pass, so they had an almost impregnable position, but then
most of the Greeks freaked out and ran away, leaving only a small
ragtag defense lead by 300 Spartans and commanded by the Spartan king
Leonidas. Despite being hugely outnumbered, the Spartans and friends
held the enemy at bay for two days. But then on the third day, the
traitor Ephialtes told the Persians of a pass through the mountains by
which they could surround the Spartans. Goddamn those
traitors...they're always fucking things up!! This lead to the downfall
and defeat of the small Greek contingent. Herodotus describes how the
Greek defenders heroically fought with their swords, and then with their
hands and teeth, until they were finally killed to the last man. While
this battle was a terrible defeat for the Greeks, it assumed legendary
status almost immediately, and thus fired up the Greeks. This battle
sparked the legend of Spartan bravery, illustrated by a story Herodotus
tells of the Spartan Dieneces, who when informed that the Persian
archers were so numerous that their barrage of arrows would completely
block out the sun, said "So much the better...then we shall fight our
battle in the shade". Years later, a memorial would be put at
Thermopylae, with the famous epitaph "Oh stranger, go tell the Spartans
that here we lie, obedient to their decrees".
Meanwhile
the fighting raged elsewhere. The Greeks fought the Persians to a
partial victory at the naval battle of Artemisium, which happens at the
same time as the Battle of Thermopylae. With the Persian army
advancing, Athens was evacuated and was then plundered by the Persians.
The Greek fleet withdrew to Salamis, and when it heard that the
Acropolis in Athens had been sacked, many grew disheartened and decided
to leave and just go and settle elsewhere. But the Greek Themistocles
persuaded others to stay and fight, leading to the decisive naval battle
at Salamis. The Greeks were outnumbered by the Persians (so typical),
but since the battle was fought in a narrow strait, the large number of
Persian ships made it difficult for the Persians to maneuver. The
result was that the Persian fleet was decimated. Xerxes suddenly
freaked out, and worried the Greeks would destroy his bridge across the
Hellespont, stranding him and his army in Europe. So like a little girl
he turned and fled, leaving a smaller army under command of the general
Mardonius to see if they could make a last ditch effort against the
Greeks. But the Spartans and the Athenians and the rest of the Hellenic
League again pooled their efforts and defeated Mardonius at the Battles
of Plataea and Mycale (479 BC), which happened on the same day (there's
a lot of these same day battles in Herodotus...odd). The Greeks
decisively win both battles, and Mardonius is killed at Plataea, and the
Persian threat to Greece is thus ended! Yay!! So everyone lived
peacefully happily ever after, right? Well, no, of course not...a
generation later Athens and Sparta went to war with each other. But
that's not in Herodotus...that's chronicled in the work of
Thucydides...also on my "to be read" list. And that's a story for
another day.
The
work ends curiously. First, back in Persia Xerxes attempts to seduce
his brother's wife, and then his brother's daughter (the latter
successfully). This leads to the destruction of his brother's family.
Oops. Herodotus does not mention it in his book, but Xerxes is
eventually assassinated. Then the book ends with a flashback to an
anecdote about Cyrus the Great. An adviser suggested to Cyrus the
following (and I paraphrase): "We're a big and powerful country now and
can invade anyone we like. Let's conquer a rich, fertile country where
the living is easy, and then we can all move there instead of living in
this Gods-forsaken desert". Cyrus replies something like "Soft lands
breed soft men", and says it is better to stay in a harsh land and rule
rather than move to a soft and fertile land and be others' slaves. Why
does Herodotus end on this note? This may be a warning to the
Athenians, who had become very powerful after the Persian Wars and had
somewhat of an empire of their own. Or it may be a warning to the
effect that happiness never lasts, and that even when people are in a
good position they get restless and then want something better; but that
can lead to something less happy than what they had in the first place
and to their eventual downfall. And that's pretty much what happened to
Persia. Don't let it happen to you.
I
read part of this book when I was in college, but never finished it.
For anyone who has started this book and then put it down, I recommend
picking it back up and seeing it through.
Reading it now has been an awesome and rewarding
experience. Sometimes we leave things
uncompleted, through boredom or perhaps wanting something more
captivating and fast-moving, sleek and sexy, easy and fertile. But
often it turns out that we didn’t fully realize what we had in our hands
and tossed it casually aside because it was too much work, or took too
much effort. Tossing
something aside because the initial thrill has gone, or because we’re
distracted by something else that comes along, or because the going is not as easy as it was at first,
is a good way to miss out on the
best things in life. Sometimes it pays to stick it out in the harsh
lands and work on something that will stay with one for life, to
struggle against its being erased by the inevitable passing of time.
No comments:
Post a Comment